Musk Says Tesla''s Credit Rating Understates Its Cash Pile

After SpaceX earned a higher Moody''s rating than Tesla, Elon Musk argued the automaker''s grade understates a balance sheet with more than $40 billion in cash and no debt.

3 min read
Musk Says Tesla''s Credit Rating Understates Its Cash Pile

AUSTIN, Texas — Elon Musk pushed back this week on how the credit-rating agencies size up Tesla, arguing that the automaker''s investment-grade score badly understates a balance sheet carrying more than $40 billion in cash and effectively no debt.

The spark: a tale of two ratings

The debate ignited after Moody''s assigned SpaceX a first-time Baa1 issuer rating with a stable outlook — two notches above Tesla''s long-standing Baa3. Musk responded directly on X, calling Tesla''s rating "ridiculously low" and adding, "Yeah, makes no sense. Tesla has over $40B in cash, no debt, and is consistently profitable!"

His point was less about SpaceX and more about how traditional methodologies treat a fast-growing, capital-light technology company. Tesla generated positive free cash flow of $1.4 billion in the first quarter of 2026 on operating cash flow of $3.9 billion, and closed the period with roughly $44.7 billion in cash and short-term investments. Those are figures most legacy automakers — many still posting losses on their EV transitions — can only envy, and they help explain why investors keep lifting their targets on the stock.

A balance sheet built for the next phase

What makes the rating debate more than a war of words is what that cash enables. Tesla is funding an enormous build-out — a dedicated Optimus factory, expanded AI training compute, and a robotaxi rollout — almost entirely from internally generated cash rather than borrowing.

Musk Says Tesla''s Credit Rating Understates Its Cash Pile — additional image

Moody''s itself affirmed Tesla''s Baa3 with a stable outlook, citing the company''s EV leadership, technology strength in autonomy, solid profitability and strong liquidity. The agency also flagged the more cyclical nature of the auto business, which is where the methodology and Musk part ways. Tesla''s leadership argues the company should be judged on its trajectory in AI, energy storage and robotics, not just quarterly vehicle margins. Musk''s own conviction in that future was on display again when he recently exercised his entire 2018 compensation package, lifting his stake rather than cashing out.

Why the optimists feel vindicated

For bulls, the exchange crystallizes a simple thesis: Tesla is a profitable, debt-free company sitting on a fortress balance sheet while it invests in several potentially trillion-dollar markets at once. That combination is rare, and it gives the company room to weather any near-term softness in the car business without diluting shareholders or leaning on capital markets.

Musk''s critique, as reported by Teslarati, also lands at a moment when sister company SpaceX is drawing premium ratings of its own, reinforcing the broader Musk-world narrative of disciplined growth funded by real cash flow.

Whether or not the agencies revisit Tesla''s grade, the underlying message is one investors have heard before and largely embraced: a company with tens of billions in cash, no net debt and expanding high-margin software and energy businesses is, by almost any practical measure, built to last. The rating may lag the story — but the fundamentals keep moving in Tesla''s favor.